SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 53

R.M.LODHA
Indian Smelting and Refining Co. Ltd. . – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Vishnu Patil and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M. LODHA, J.:---Rule. Returnable forthwith. Mr. Ganguli waives service for respondent No. 1. Service of respondent No. 2 is dispensed with. Heard finally at this stage by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Indian Smelting Refining Co. Ltd. (for short "the employer") aggrieved by the order dated September 3, 1997 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai, whereby the said Tribunal rejected the application made by the employer for deciding the issues relating to maintainability of the complaint as preliminary issues.

3.The brief facts essential for the disposal of the writ petition and the contentions advanced by the learned Counsel for the parties are : Shri Subhash Vishnu Patil (for short "the workman") - the 1st respondent herein - was employed by the employer in the year 1978 as Shell Mould Cum ore Maker. The workman is an active member of a union, namely, the Association of Engineering Workers. The Association of Engineering Workers, which according to the employer, is not a recognised union, submitted a charter of demands in or about the year 1984 to the employer.







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top