SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 475

R.M.LODHA
Agyarani Dua – Appellant
Versus
Vidyagauri J. Tripati and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M. LODHA, J.:---By this Notice of Motion taken out by the defendants it is prayed that plaint be rejected under Order VII, Rule 11, C.P.C. being barred by law of limitation.

2.The plaintiff in the suit has prayed for declaration that the agreement dated 24-11-1984 be declared to have been abdicated and/or given up or in the alternative it be declared that the said agreement for sale dated 24-11-1984 is void/voidable for want of consideration and for not abiding by the material terms thereof and therefore illegal, bad in law and not binding on the plaintiff. The plaintiff has also sought the relief that the defendants being trespassers be ordered and decreed to hand over quiet, vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises i.e. flat No. 12, Building No. 24, Ashish Co-operative Housing Society, Guru Nagar, J.P. Road., Andheri (West), Bombay. In the alternative, the plaintiff has prayed for decree of Rs. 3,71,000/- together with interest on the said principal sum at the rate of 18% per annum and damages to the tune of Rs. 30,00,000/-.

3.The brief facts which have been highlighted in the plaint are that on 1-9-1972 the said suit premises were given on the leave and lic

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top