SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 332

S.N.VARIAVA, V.R.DATAR
Orkay Industries Ltd. . and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


Judgment

S.N. VARIAVA, J.:---By all these petitions the petitioners pray that the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate Courts, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, be quashed. In some of these petitions a prayer is also made that undertakings given by the concerned petitioners to those courts, to pay amounts, be also quashed and/or set aside.

2.Most of these petitions have been filed by Directors of two companies viz. Orkay Industries Limited and Atash Industries (India) Limited. In most of these petitions the concerned company is also a party. In some, it is a co-petitioner. In some, it is a respondent. In all these petitions common questions of law are raised. The main question raised before this Court is whether by virtue of section 536(2) read with section 441(2) of the Companies Act providing that all transfers made, after the commencement of winding up, will be void, any offence can be deemed to have been committed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. According to the petitioners, as the payments, if made, would have been void under section 536(2) of the Companies Act, they were justified in refusing to do a void act and there is no "







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top