SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Bom) 571

B.B.VAGYANI
Parwatibai w/o Vijaydas Vaishnav & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - `B.B. VAGYANI, J.:---The short point that arises for consideration is what is the range of application of the notification issued by the Government of Maharashtra granting exemption of Court Fees for woman litigants in cases relating to (a) maintenance (b) Property Dispute (c) Violence and (d) Divorce.

2. In brief, the facts giving rise to the present civil revision application are as under:

The present petitioner No. 1 is the widow of deceased Vijaydas Vaishnav. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 are minor children of deceased Vijaydas Vaishnav. The petitioner Nos. 2 to 5 being minors are under the guardianship of their real mother i.e. petitioner No. 1.

3. The respondent No. 1 is the State of Maharashtra. Respondent No. 2 is the Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad, to whom the Tanker involved in the accident belongs. The respondent No. 3 is the driver of the Tanker, who is admittedly in the employment of the respondent No. 2. The respondent No. 4 is the Insurance Company with whom the Tanker is insured.

4. It is alleged by the petitioner that the respondent No. 3 drove the Tanker in a rash and negligent manner and committed an accident. In the said accident, Vijaydas Vaishnav, husban





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top