SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Bom) 397

S.B.MHASE
Fulsing Ramsingh Rajpur and another – Appellant
Versus
Durgabai wife of Shivsingh Rajput – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.B. MHASE, J.:---This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in Reg. Civil Appeal No. 210/79 decided by District Judge, Buldhana on 30-11-82 confirming judgment and decree of partition passed by Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. Buldhana on 13-8-79 in R.C.S. No. 243/77.

Brief facts of the case are that one Ramsing was the main propositor of the family, who was the maternal grand-father of plaintiff/respondent. Said Ramsing was having four sons viz. Rustam (D-1), Fulsing (D-2), Tukaram and Gulabsing-father of plaintiff-respondent. Tukaram one of the sons of Ramsingh was also dead and deft. No. 3 Ramdas is son of Tukaram. The father of the plaintiff/respondent Gulabsing expired on 8-5-57. At the time of death of Gulabsing, there was a joint family and co-parcenery of defendant No. 1 to 3 and his deceased brother Tukaram. The suit property is the joint family property of the said family. The respondent is claiming her ¼ the share in the suit property.

3. Pending the suit, original defendant No. 1 Rustam expired and his undivided share in the suit property has been inherited by original defendants 2 and 3 i.e. by the present appellants.

4. The Civil Judge, Jr. Dn.,
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top