JUDGMENT - T.K. CHANDRASEKHARA DAS, J.:---The petitioner herein challenges the orders impugned in this case evidenced by Exhibit A, B, and C, whereby the claim of the petitioner that he is a tenant in respect of the land comprised in Section No. 414 now Gat No. 1004 measuring 5 acres and 5 gunthas in Arale Village, Dist. Satara are negatived. According to the petitioner he was the tenant under the respondent No. 2 in possession and his name appears in Wahiwat column of the record of rights of the suit land during the period from 1956 to 1960-61. By virtue of the proceedings under section 32-G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agriculture Land Act, 1948 an order came to be passed in favour of the petitioner on 10-10-1965. Accordingly purchase price was fixed at Rs. 391.59. It appears that this order has become final as the land lord did not take the matter in appeal. The petitioner when he was dispossessed at the instance of the respondent No. 1 who was the purchaser of the land from respondent No. 2 landlord, approached the Civil Court by filing suit as Civil Suit No. 245 of 1967 on the file of the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara for recovery of the possession of the proper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document