SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Bom) 326

S.H.KAPADIA
ESSEL Packaging Ltd. . and others – Appellant
Versus
ESSEL Tea Exports Ltd. and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT -S.H.KAPADIA, J.:---Defendants and their Advocate absent though served.

2.The above suit has been filed for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants herein from using the word "ESSEL" as part of the corporate name of the defendants---Essels Tea Exports Limited. The suit is for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants from using the word "ESSEL" to pass off or enable others to pass off the goods and or business of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have applied for grant of injunction in terms of prayers (a) and (b) of the Notice of Motion which reads as follows:-

"(a) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit, the Defendants by themselves, their servants and agents or otherwise howsoever be restrained by a perpetual order and injunction of this Honourable Court from in any manner using the word ESSEL as part of their corporate name and/or trade name and/or trade mark in order to pass off or enable others to pass off their business or goods as and for those of the plaintiffs."

"(b) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit the Defendants by themselves, their servants and agents or otherwise howsoever be restrained by a perpetual order an























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top