JUDGMENT - R.K. BATTA, J.:---These petitions have arisen on account of same judgment passed by the Administrative Tribunal in Mundkar Revision Appln. No. 78/89. Writ Petition No. 307/92 is filed by a mundkar and Writ Petition No. 390/92 is filed by the landlord. The landlord had filed a civil suit for eviction of Keshav Bablo Gawde and in that suit, Keshav Gawde had taken the plea that he along with his 4 brothers were occupying the house as mundkars. Accordingly, the Civil Court had referred the issue of Mundkarship to the Mamlatdar. Before the Mamlatdar, the landlord Ramakant Khandeparkar had submitted that due to floods, he had offered to the Government his land lying at higher level for being divided into plots to be allotted to the occupants of the house who were affected due to flood and that accordingly, the family of Keshav Gawde and his brothers were jointly given 5 plots in Survey No. 67/1; that though his other brothers had shifted from the house, Keshav Gawde did not shift. The Mamlatdar came to the conclusion that Keshav Gawde and his brothers were staying in a joint family; that the land allotted to and accepted by other members of the joint family could not be said t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document