SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 248

UPASANI PRATIBHA
Sonia Senroy of Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Amit Senroy of Mumbai – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DR. PRATIBHA UPASANI, J.:---This Chamber Summons is taken out by the plaintiff Mrs. Sonia Senroy, praying that the defendant be directed to produce and give inspection of the documents incorporated in Schedule A annexed to the Chamber Summon and furnish copies thereof to the plaintiff. It is also prayed that defendant be directed to answer on oath the interrogatories set-out at Schedule B of the Chamber Summons taken out by the plaintiff.

2.The plaintiff, who is the wife of defendant, has filed this suit against the defendant husband praying that the defendant be directed to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs. 27,000/- per month by way of permanent maintenance for herself as set-out in Exhibit Q annexed to the plaint. It is also prayed that the defendant husband be directed to pay to the plaintiff for the minor child Johann, a sum of Rs, 7,000/- per month by way of permanent maintenance as set-out at Annexure R to the plaint. In Annexure Q, the plaintiff has specified the expenses and has given a breakup under various heads like transportation, household expenses, servant's salary, telephone bill, society outgoing, electricity bill and miscellaneous/personal expenses. In


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top