SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 5

R.M.LODHA
Mahalaxmi Shikshan Sanstha – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


Judgment

R.M. LODHA, J.:---The petitioners, by means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seek to assail the legality and correctness of the order dated 16-4-85 passed by the School Tribunal. Bombay Region, Bombay whereby the said tribunal set aside the notification dated 31st July, 1984 issued by the petitioners removing the respondent No. 3 herein from the post of Headmaster and directed the petitioners to reinstate the respondent No. 3 herein in the same post with consequential benefits.

2.The first petitioner Mahalaxmi Shikshan Sanstha, Mumbai is the public trust and runs a school known as Vidyamandir High School. The second petitioner is a Chairman of the trust namely the first petitioner. Shri. Jagannath Gajanan Jadhav who is impleaded as respondent No. 3 herein and hereinafter referred to as an 'employee' was appointed as Headmaster on 13-6-79 by the management of the first petitioner, hereinafter referred to as 'management'. The employee was temporarily suspended on 29-2-80 on the allegation of lack of satisfactory performance and dereliction of duties. According to the management on 4-3-1980, Director of Education superseded the school admin







































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top