VISHNU SAHAI, RANJANA DESAI
Gopal Mahadeo Tambada – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2.The deceased Chintamani Tambada was the younger brother of the appellant. It is said that there was a dispute between them on account of land. The appellant was taking the entire yield. About six months prior to the incident, the appellant had come to the deceased with the intention to kill him. About two months prior to the incident, Chintaman Tambada had sold the grass and had appropriated the entire proceeds. Since no partition between the appellant and Chintaman Tambada had taken place, the former was angry with the latter.
On 4th June 1981, sometimes between 1 p.m. to 2 p.m., Chintaman Tambada, his wife Kamubai (P.W. 2), their sons Sunil and Nandkumar were sitting in a small hut in Vakharicha Vada, within the limits of Police Station Tarapur, District Thane. At that time, the appellant alongwith his sons Ravindra and Bharat came in a bullock cart. The said bullo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.