JUDGMENT- S.S. DANI, J.:---The petitioner-landlord challenges the order dated 16-9-1986 of the Tahsildar, Buldana: the order dated on 31-3-1987 of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Buldana, as well as the order dated 29-12-1989 of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur, in respect of the possession of the land asked for under section 36(2) read with section 21 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act").

2.The property involved is an area of 5.37 acres of Survey No. 21/1/ of Village Bhadola, Taluka and District : Buldana. The present petitioner is the owner of the property and the present respondent No. 1 is a tenant of it from 7-5-1967. It is the case of the present petitioner that the respondent-tenant was the partner with the present petitioner as per the partnership deed dated 4-12-1968 in respect of this property and, as such, should have delivered the possession to the petitioner after the expiry of the period of partnership. On failure, the present petitioner then approached the Civil Court in Regular Civil Suit No. 34 of 1973 for possession of the property and in pursuance of the plea raised by the respondent in respect of the tenancy of the property, the matter was referred to the Tahsildar, Chikkli, under section 125 of the said Act. The- respondent was then held to be a tenant by the Tahsildar, and the appeals filed by the present petitioner to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Buldana and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur, were dismissed. The-petitioner also approached this Court in writ petition, which also came to be rejected by this Court. The petitioner-landlord then moved the Tenancy Authorities, i.e., the Tahsildar, Buldana, for possession under section 36(2) read with section 21 of the said Act. The case was numbered as 2/TNC/59/85-86, and by an order dated 16-9-1986, the application came to be rejected by the Tahsildar. The matter was then carried in Revenue Appeal No. TNC/- Bhadola/7/86-87, and the Sub-Divisional Officer, Buldana, dismissed the said appeal by an order dated 31-3-1987, confirming the order of the Tahsildar. Revision bearing No. Tenancy-A/97/87 to the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal at Nagpur also came to be dismissed by an order dated 29-12-1989. It is against these orders that the present petitioner has approached this Court in the present writ petition.

3.Shri Deshpande, learned Counsel for the petitioner-landlord, submitted that all the Authorities below have committed an error in rejecting this application on the ground that it was not within the period stipulated by section 36(2) of the said Act. It is further submitted that the present application was under section 21 of the said Act, and for such an application the limitation prescribed by section 36(2) of the said Act was of two years.

4.The provisions of the said Act, relevant for the purpose of decision of this case, are sections 20, 21, 36, 41 to 44 and section 50. Section 20 of the said Act makes a provision for surrendering of tenancy rights by the tenant, and section 21 of the said Act deals with the right of the landlord to retain the land, after such surrender of tenancy. Section 36 of the said Act deals with the procedure for taking possession and under sub-section (2) of section 36, the period of two years for the landlord to obtain the possession is prescribed. Section 50 of the said Act provides that, when a tenancy is created by a landlord after the date specified in section 49-A(1) of the said Act (i.e., 1-4-1963), a tenant is entitled to purchase it within one year from the commencement of the tenancy and the provisions of sections 41 to 44 of the said Act in respect of the right of the tenant to purchase the land shall apply to such purchase. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that when the tenancy is created, as contemplated by section 50 of the said Act and if the tenant fails to purchase it within one year from the commencement of the tenan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document