SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Bom) 384

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(AURANGABAD BENCH)
A.D. Mane R.G. Deshpande, JJ.
Dagadu Shankar Todmal ..... Appellant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 1995, decided on 28/29-7-1997.
Advocates appeared :
D. Pokharkar, for the appellant.
R.S. Deshmukh, A.P.P., for the respondent-State.

The prosecution must prove the elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt in order to secure a conviction.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 498-A, 307 IPC - CONVICTION SET ASIDE - INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE - SECTION 498-A IPC - CRUELTY - NOT ESTABLISHED - SECTION 307 IPC - ATTEMPT TO COMMIT MURDER - NOT PROVED.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted by the trial court for the offences punishable under sections 498-A and 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The prosecution alleged that the appellant had subjected his wife, Vandana, to cruelty and had attempted to murder her by setting her on fire. The appellant denied the charges and claimed that the incident was an accident.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court found that the evidence on record was insufficient to prove the charges against the appellant. The Court noted that Vandana's testimony was inconsistent and unreliable, and that there was no independent evidence to corroborate her allegations of cruelty. The Court also found that there was no evidence to suggest that the appellant had intended to kill Vandana.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution had proved that the appellant had subjected Vandana to cruelty within the meaning of section 498-A of the IPC. 2. Whether the prosecution had proved that the appellant had attempted to murder Vandana.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the evidence on record was insufficient to prove that the appellant had subjected Vandana to cruelty. The Court noted that the incidents referred to by the prosecution, such as disputes over cooking and accusations of selling a saree, were not sufficient to constitute cruelty within the meaning of section 498-A of the IPC. 2. The Court held that there was no evidence to suggest that the appellant had intended to kill Vandana. The Court noted that the appellant had not made any threats to kill Vandana and that there was no evidence of premeditation.

Final Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence of the appellant, and ordered his release.

JUDGMENT - R.G. DESHPANDE, J.:---This appeal is filed by the original accused No. 1 Dagadu Shankar Todmal, against the judgement and order, dated 5-1-1995, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No.345 of 1994, whereby, the learned Additional Sessions Judge found the appellant accused guilty of the offence punishable under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for nine months and further found him guilty for the offence punishable under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1½ years. Along with the original accused No. 1 present appellant, his mother Kausalyabai original accused No. 2 was also tried for the offences referred to above, however, the learned Additional Sessions Judge found the evidence on record short to convict the original accused No. 2 and, therefore, she is acquitted of the offences charged with.

2.The facts of the case in nut-shell can be narrated as under :-

Original complainant Vandana, who happens to be P.W. 3 in the present matter, was married to the accused No.1 Dagadu on 31-3-1994, whereafter, she resided with her husband and her in-laws, including the original accused No. 2 her mother-in-law. It is the case of the prosecution that matrimonial residential house of the complainant is situated at Mhaske Chawl, Jeur, which is just at a distance of 1½ kms. from the house of the accused No.1 i.e. at village Todmalwadi.

3.The prosecution story further proceeds by narrating that some time after the marriage of Vandana she had gone to her maternal aunt's house to attend the marriage and thereafter, she came to her parent's house. On the next day morning, according to the prosecution story, she went to the house of her husband. However, at that time she had forgotten one of her sarees at her parent's house which is said to have been an excuse for the husband to get enraged on Vandana by saying that she must have sold the said saree to somebody. On this accusation, he also beat Vandana on that day. It is the case of the prosecution that Vandana was being ill-treated on various grounds, including that she was not able to cook the food well and further that she was getting fat.

4.The prosecution story mainly centres around specific allegation that at the time of marriage of Vandana with the accused No.1 Dagadu, it was agreed that by way of dowry Rs. 11,000/- would be paid to the accused, out of which Rs. 6,000/- were already paid and Rs. 5,000/- remained to be paid, because of which, according to the prosecution Vandana was being ill-treated.

5.On the fateful day i.e. on 30-6-1994, at about 9.30 a.m. Vandana had cleaned the house and at that time accused was present in the house. Accused again repeated his demand of Rs. 5,000/- which were not paid to him and therefore, he called for the explanation from Vandana as to why she did not bring the same from her father. On this pretext, he also beat her. Vandana replied that her parents were poor and it was difficult for them to make the payment of remaining Rs. 5,000/-. Thereafter, the prosecution story narrates that, Vandana was cooking food. At that time, the accused No.1 poured kerosene on her person and set her on fire. According to the prosecution, the accused No. 2 at that time was present in the house. Vandana caught fire, sustained burn injuries and she ran out of the house shouting. The neighbours gathered and extinguished the fire. Message was given to Raosaheb brother of Vandana, who came on the spot and took her in a jeep to Ahmednagar, where she was admitted in Dr. Tholar's Hospital. Vandana had sustained burn injuries on her chest, back and on legs. She was treated in Dr. Tholar's Hospital and hospital authorities informed to M.I.



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top