JUDGMENT - B.H. MARLAPALLE,J.:-The petitioner, on passing his B.A. Examination, Came to be appointed for the first time as an Assistant Teacher on purely temporary b for a period from 1-7-1986 to 30-4-1987 vide appointment order dated 30-6-1987 issued by respondent No. 3, who is the Head Master of Daduji Pethe Vidyalaya, by respondent No. 2, Education Society. At the end of academic year 1966-87, he discontinued and a fresh appointment order dated 30-6-1987 was issued to him again on purely temporary basis for the period from 1-7-1987 to 30-4-1988, i.e. for academic year 1987-88. The services of the petitioner was again discontinued fror 5-1988 at the end of the academic year and for the next academic year 1988-89 was issued a-fresh appointment order dated 30-6-1988 on a purely temporary bi for the period from 1-7-1988 to 30-4-1989. The petitioner was not a trained teac and he was appointed purely on temporary basis against a permanent vacancy. tenporary appointments as mentioned hereinabove, were duly approved by Education Officer and he was not appointed for the academic year 1989-90 and did not raise any grievance in that respect against respondents No. 2 3.

2.It appears that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document