SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 733

T.K.CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS
Pravin Padmakar Kamatkar – Appellant
Versus
Pratibha Ratanlal Goyal and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - T.K. CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS, J.:---The petitioner was implicated in the Criminal Case No. 181 of 1982 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pune for commission of offence under section 114 of I.P.C. in the commission of offence of Bigamy of one Ratanlal Goyal and Nisha. Both Ratanlal and Nisha are the colleagues working in the petitioner's Bank. The allegation against Ratanlal and Nisha was that they entered into second marriage while Ratanlal's wife, first respondent herein, was alive. The allegation, in particular, against petitioner is that the said marriage was out of the conspiracy hatched and the petitioner was party to the conspiracy. Therefore the allegation against the petitioner was that he was an abator to the marriage of Ratanlal and Nisha.

2.I heard learned Counsel for the petitioner Shri. Anturkar and Mrs. Usha Kejriwal for respondent No. 2.

3.At the time of admission, there was interim stay of further proceedings of M.A. No. 181 of 1992, against applicant alone. The complaint made before the Magistrate by the first respondent was annexed as Annexure 'A' to this petition which is in Marathi. The relevant portion has been translated in English by the l








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top