SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 592

A.V.SAVANT, S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Pandurang Rangnath Chavan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.V. SAVANT, J.:-Heard both the learned Counsel; Shri Ketkar for the petitioner and Shri Sonavane, Asstt. Government Pleader for the respondents.

2.By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner prays for quashing (i) the Judgment and Order dated 11th October 1989 passed by the Caste Certificates Scrutiny Committee, Maharashtra State, Pune, and (ii) the appellate order dated 20th March 1991 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik, dismissing the petitioner's appeal. The petitioner claimed to be a Thakar" belonging to the Scheduled Tribe of Thakars as specified by the President of India after consultation with the Governor of the State in accordance with the provisions of Article 342 of the Constitution. Under the impugned Judgments and Orders he has been held to be belonging to the Thakar caste, which under the impugned Government Resolution dated 8th July 1982 has been declared to be one of the 'Other Backward Classes', mentioned at Entry 200. Thus, rejecting the petitioner's contention that he belongs to the Scheduled Tribe of Thakars, a finding has been recorded that the petitioner belongs to the "Other Backward Class" of Th















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top