SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Bom) 447

B.B.VAGYANI
Pankuwarbai wd/o Dalpatrao Mutha and other – Appellant
Versus
Rameshchandra s/o Dalpatrao Mutha and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.B. VAGYANI, J.:-Heard Shri R.M. Borde, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Shri Chaudhary for the respondents.

2.With the consent of the learned Counsel of the parties, the matter has been heard and finally disposed of.

3.Too technical approach not only mars the sacrosanct spirit but frustrates the very soul of the scheme, which has been declared and implemented by the Govern payment of Court fees.

4.The facts of this civil revision application lie within very narrow compass.

5.After sad demise of Ganeshchand Mutha, who happens to be the son of the petitioner No. 1 and other co-petitioners initiated Civil action for grant of Succession Certificate, in respect of the debts, securities, cash, shares, insurance policies, etc. left by late Ganeshchand Mutha.

6.The settlement was arrived at in between the respondent and petitioners Nos. 1 to 4. In response to the amicable settlement, the learned Trial Judge, allowed the application for grant of Succession Certificate and by his order dated 18-3-1197 directed to issue Succession Certificate in the names of petitioners Nos. 1 to 4, in respect of the debts, securities, shares, insurance policies, etc. left by the deceased Gan















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top