A.A.DESAI, S.S.PARKAR
SudhakarShankarGawli – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent
2. Mr. Nargolkar, the learned Counsel while questioning the correctness of the impugned decision dated 24-3-1994 mainly and principally raised the question that the Committee was not competent to verify the claim of the employees of the State Transport Corporation. The learned Counsel specifically raised his ground in the petition. The respondents have not filed any return to counter the ground as raised.
3. With the assistance of the learned Counsel for the parties we have perused the said G.R. dated 23rd January 1985. The G.R. has specified the matters which could be referred to the Scrutiny Committee. The caste claim of the employee of the Transport Corporation n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.