SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Bom) 548

VISHNU SAHAI, T.K.CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS
Gulab Saheblal Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J.:---Through this appeal, the appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 2-4-1994, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 102/1993, whereby he has been convicted and sentenced in the manner stated hereinafter:---

(i) Under section 302 I.P.C. to undergo imprisonment of life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- i.d. to undergo 1 month R.I. ; and

(ii) Under section 326 I.P.C. to 5 years R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- i.d. to undergo 3 months R.I.

The substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. In short, the prosecution case runs as under :---

The informant-victim Rashida Shaikh P.W. 1 was the second wife of Nazir Shaikh, real brother of the appellant. Nazir's first wife Niyamatbi was residing separately in Ganesh Peth, Pune. The appellant at the time of the incident, was working in Metal Works Factory which was located near the house of Niyamatbi. From a reading of the evidence, it appears that he was financing Niyamatbi.

From the evidence of the informant, it appears that periodically, the appellant used to take money from her to give to Niyamatbi. It appears that the informant stopped giving money to th



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top