SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 892

D.D.SINHA
Secretary, Shiorai Education Society – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, School Tribunal & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.D. SINHA, J.:---Heard Shri A.P. Deshpande, learned Advocate for the petitioner, Shri R.K. Deshpande learned Advocate for respondent No. 2 and Shri T.R. Kankale, learned A.G.P. for respondents Nos. 1 and 4.

2. The writ petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 23-2-1989 passed by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal in Appeal No. 45/88-A preferred by the respondent No. 2 which was allowed by the Tribunal.

3. The respondent No. 2 was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher w.e.f. 1-7-1968 in the school run by the petitioner. As per the seniority list published by petitioner-management, respondent No. 2 was the senior most teacher in category 'C' and respondent No. 3 was junior to respondent No. 2. One Shri Vithal Chintaman Gandhewar was appointed as the Headmaster of respondent school on 5-7-1968 and since then he worked as Head Master till 7-5-1968. After Shri Gandhewar was retired as Head Master, the petitioner management appointed respondent No. 3 as Head Master. The respondent No. 2 therefore filed appeal before the School Tribunal. The Tribunal allowed appeal and set aside the appointment of respondent No. 3 to the post of Head Master. Being aggri

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top