SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 11

S.B.MHASE
Deubai Tukaram Pakhare & others – Appellant
Versus
Muktabai Tukaram Pakhare & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.B. MHASE, J.:---This revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Beed on 3-1-1989 below Exhibit 22 by which the respondents have requested the trial Court to allow the amendment to the objection which they have filed in Misc. Application No. 82 of 1985.

2. Misc. Application No. 82 of 1985 has been filed by the revision petitioners under section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to obtain succession certificate after the death of Tukaram Janu Pakhare who expired on 17-9-1983. After the notice was issued by the Civil Court the respondents have filed objection on 23-10-1985 and have contended that the petitioner Deubai is not legally wedded wife of the deceased Tukaram, but objector No. 1 Muktabai is legally wedded wife of deceased Tukaram. Thereafter in para No. 5, the genealogy is given. Said genealogy has shown Deubai as second wife and it is further shown that Vinod petitioner No. 2 and Manoj alias Shrikant, petitioner No. 3 are the sons of Tukaram. It requires to be stated at this stage only that even though the status of Deubai has been challenged in the said objection petition, still the status of Vinod and Manoj

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top