V.K.BARDE, B.B.VAGYANI
Manohar Dadarao Landge – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2. Heard Shri P.M. Shah, Counsel appointed for the appellant, and Shri K.M. Babhulgaonkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the respondent State.
3. The facts giving rise to this prosecution case are as follows :
(a) Savita, wife of accused Manohar, got married with him in the year 1989. She had a son of two and half years age at the time of incident. Both of them were residing in hut at Phulenagar at Kaij (District : Beed). On 3-6-1993, at about 9 p.m., Savita received burn injuries. Her husband Manohar and the neighbours put off the fire. The prosecution has alleged that, at that time, Savita was saying to Manohar, that he had set her on fire and she had asked him, at least, to give water. Manohar, after puttin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.