SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 483

Southern Automatic Industries Pvt. Ltd. . and another – Appellant
Versus
N. S. Talpade and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.V. SAVANT, J.:---Heard both the learned Counsel; Shri Jhangiani for the petitioners (original opponent in the trial Court) and Shri Chabria for respondent No. 1 Smt. Talpade (original disputant No. 2). None appears for respondent No. 2 Co-operative Housing Society (Original disputant No.1) though served.

2.This petition of 1989 seeks to challenge the order dated 28th February, 1989 passed by the Co-operative Appellate Court by which Appeal No. 13 of 1989 filed by respondent No. 1 Smt. Talpade was allowed. In the result the order dated 31st October, 1988 passed by the Co-operative Court, Mumbai holding that the dispute lodged by opponents on 11th September, 1978 in the Co-operative Court was not maintainable in the Co-operative Court for want of jurisdiction was set aside. A few relevant facts may be stated for appreciating the short controversy as to whether the Co-operative Court will have jurisdiction to entertain the dispute in view of the provisions of section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short "Societies Act") and section 28 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 (for short "Rent Act").

3.The first resp





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top