SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 412

Shrimant s/o Baburao Sarode – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.:---Heard Mr. V.D. Solunke, learned Counsel for petitioner, Mrs. A. Rasal, learned A.G.P. for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. S.N. Yadav, learned Counsel for respondent No. 3.

2.Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties.

3.The petitioner was admitted in respondent No. 3 college to the 1st Year of D. Pharmacy Course. He appeared for First Year examination held in the month of April, 1997 and he passed in 4 subjects and failed in two subjects. Accordingly, he was given the benefit of Allowed To Keep Term (ATKT). He was admitted to the second year D. Pharmacy for the academic year 1997-98. He appeared for the supplementary examination of First Year D. Pharmacy held in the month of October, 1997 for the remaining two subjects, when he was already an ex-student of the IInd year D. Pharmacy.

It appears that the petitioner was charged with malpractice in the said supplementary examination and investigation was conducted in the said charges. Meanwhile, petitioner continued to attend his 2nd year D. Pharmacy theory as well as practical classes.

4.By an order dated 23-3-1998, passed by the respondent No. 2, petitioner was informed that he has been















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top