SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 788

D.G.DESHPANDE
Ramnath Sadashiv Koltharkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.G. DESHPANDE, J.:--Heard Mr. Bichu for the applicant and A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petition is filed for quashing the order of the Special Judge (U.D. Salvi), Mumbai, dated 4-12-1997 by which he rejected the application of the accused petitioner which was filed for discharge.

3. Mr. Bichu contended that the accused was charge-sheeted for offences under the provisions of The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, hereinafter referred to as the "Act of 1989". The alleged offence took place on 3-4-1997. F.I.R. was filed on 28-4-1997. Investigation was completed and last statement was recorded on the same date i.e. 28-4-1997 and charge sheet came to be filed in August, 1997. According to him the accused had claimed discharge on a purely legal ground arising from the provisions of the Act of 1989 itself. He urged that under section 9 of the said Act of 1989, it was for the State Government to appoint any officer of the Government with powers under this Act for the purpose of carrying out investigation in respect of the offences under this Act and the State Government could confer such powers by notification in Official Gazette. How















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top