R.J.KOCHAR, N.J.PANDYA
Harvindersingh Marwah (Dr. ) – Appellant
Versus
Charanjit Kaur – Respondent
2. The allegations made in the petition and sought to be made out in the deposition was to the effect that the respondent was of a very suspicious nature and she always suspected the husband to be playing around with his lady patients and showing undue interest in his brother's wife. The petitioner is a homeopathic doctor.
3. The petitioner has examined himself before the trial Court along with one more witness Maninder Singh and wife of that gentleman. In all three witnesses were examined. On behalf of the respondent-wife only the respondent herself was examined.
4. Before filing the petition, notice Exhibit 17 was served upon the respondent-wife setting out all the details which are to be found in the petition. That the notice has been received, no reply has been sent, which is an admitted position. In her examin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.