SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 381

VISHNU SAHAI, T.K.CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS
Haroon Mahatab Jamadar and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J.:---Through Criminal Appeal No. 601 of 1995, the appellants (Haroon Mahatab Jamadar, Mahatab Ibrahim Jamadar, Sharifa Mahatab Jamadar, Ibrahim Mahatab Jamadar, Ismail Mahatab Jamadar, and Nehru @ Jawarddin Mahatab Jamadar) have challenged the judgment and order dated 22-9-1995, passed by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 110 of 1995, whereby they have been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life, for the offence punishable under section 302 read with section 34 I.P.C. Through the said appeal, appellant-Sharifa Mahatab Jamadar has also challenged her conviction and sentence of three months R.I. and fine of Rs. 100/- in default, 15 days R.I. for offence under section 506 (ii) I.P.C. The substantive sentences of Sharifa Mahatab Jamadar have been directed to run concurrently.

Criminal Application No. 3684 of 1995 has been preferred for bail by the appellants Ibrahim Mahatab Jamadar, Ismail Mahatab Jamadar and Nehru @ Jawarddin Mahatab Jamadar.

Since, we are finally disposing of Criminal Appeal No. 601 of 1995, we reject Criminal Application No. 3684 of 1998.

2. In short, the prosecution case runs as under :-

2(A














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top