SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 720

D.G.DESHPANDE
Yashwant Nanubhai Pingle – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra (CBI) – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.G. DESHPANDE, J.:---Heard Mr. Nalawade, Advocate for the appellant, Mr. Mehta, Advocate for C.B.I. and A.P.P. for the State. This is an appeal by the accused, who was Customs Officer, against his conviction by Special Judge (R.S. Dalvi) under section 5(1)(d) punishable under section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act by which he was sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year on each counts. The prosecution case in brief was that the present accused, who was the Customs Officer, had demanded Rs. 600/- as illegal gratification from one Ramdev Prasad, who was working at Gate Way of India as a photographer, for allowing him and his five colleagues to carry on their business of photography at Gate Way of India and for giving them licence in that regard.

2. As per the prosecution case, this demand was made from Ramdev Prasad by the present accused as well as the acquitted accused Mohammed Noor Khan, and Ramdev Prasad filed a complaint against both of them on 16-1-1986. Accordingly, trap was arranged and carried out on 20-1-1986 in presence of panchas and amount of Rs. 600/- was recovered from the present accused.

3. After investigation and obtaining sanction, a charge-sheet w

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top