S.S.NIJJAR
Jagdish Gandhi and another – Appellant
Versus
Satish B. Vaidya and others – Respondent
2.The plaintiff No. 1 claims to be Researcher in ancient Indian Science including Indology, Archaeology, Numismatics, Ayurveda etc. He claims to have studied Ayurveda in depth on his own for about three decades. Plaintiff No. 2 is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. Defendant No. 1, according to the plaintiffs, made series of representations to the plaintiffs which misled the plaintiffs to enter into an agreement with defendant No. 1 on 15th August 1996. The basic idea behind the agreement or Memorandum of Agreement dated 15th August, 1996 between defendant No. 2 and the plaintiff was to join hands for commercial exploitation of the formula alleg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.