T.K.CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS
Balkrishna Harischandra Patil – Appellant
Versus
Madhukar Madhavrao Deshpande – Respondent
2.I heard Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Anturkar and Mr. R.S. Deshpande for the respondent.
3.The admitted fact is that the property in suit situated at 4/36, Sahakari Sevakanchi Sahakari Vasahat, Erandawane, Pune was originally belonged to one K.M. Patil. Said K.M. Patil let out the building for residential purpose for the rent of Rs. 250/- in the year 1970. The petitioner herein was recovering the rent from the respondent and used to pass receipts on behalf of the landlord K.M. Patil. The deceased landlord K.M. Patil had sent notice dated 20-4-1982 to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.