SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 195

VISHNU SAHAI, RANJANA DESAI
Modaram Purohit – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J.:---Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This is an application for bail by Modaram J. Purohit, Original Accused No. 2, who was tried along with six others by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay, in N.D.P.S. Special Case No. 7/95 and 2/96 and convicted and sentenced in the manner stated hereinafter:

(i) under section 8(c) read with section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, N.D.P.S. Act) to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- in default to undergo three months rigorous imprisonment (for being found in possession of 1.500 Kg. of Mandrex tablets on 12-11-1994 at 4.40 p.m.); and

(ii) under section 8(c) read with section 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/-, in default to undergo three months rigorous imprisonment (for being found in possession of 86 Kgs. and 250 Gramas of Mandrex tablets in pursuance of conspiracy with Original Accused No. 6).

2. According to the prosecution, on 12-11-1994 at 10.00 a.m. D.C.P., Narcotics Branch, received information from an informer that a gang of drug traffickers, of which the appl


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top