SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 171

N.V.DABHOLKAR, S.B.MHASE, N.J.PANDYA
Sheikh Mohamed Fatemohamed – Appellant
Versus
Raisuddin Azimuddin Katil – Respondent


JUDGMENT - N.J. PANDYA, A.C.J.:---With reference to the provisions of Hyderabad Abolition of Inams and Cash Grants Act, 1954, section 2-A, (hereinafter referred to as the "said Act") an interesting question arose before the Division Bench of this Court on 31-1-1989. The said Act, as the name suggests, is enacted in keeping pace with the post independence exercise of the land reforms. As a part of that drive, various State Governments in the country were undertaking the exercise of abolition of different tenures and make a simple ground reality by enabling the actual tiller to become an occupant, free from interference of so called landlords, half of whom were absentee, making the occupant tiller to till throughout his life for the benefit of that landlord. With this sort of expectation and to stop exploitation going over for centuries, the Statutes had to be enacted and one of such Statues is the said Act.

2. The balance had to be struck in the course of land reforms, that both the tiller and his erstwhile landlord should get a fair deal and therefore, procedural aspect had to be taken care of. As a part of that, in the said Act, section 2-A was enacted, which is reproduced for eas
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top