JUDGMENT - R.M. LODHA, J.:---In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the supplementary bills/debit notes issued by respondent No. 2 for the period 26-11-91 to 6-5-94 and for the period 7-3-94 to 29-3-94 (Exhibits "B" and "C" respectively) and notice of demand incorporated in bill dated 29-3-95 (Exhibit "A to the writ petition).

2.The first petitioner is one of the partners of the 2nd petitioner firm. The 1st respondent is Bombay Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. The 1st respondent supplies electricity to the consumers in the city of Bombay. The 2nd respondent is the Superintendent Consumer, BEST Undertaking who has issued the impugned debit notes. The petitioners have stated in the writ petition that prior to 1980 one Shri Fakir Mohd. Hussien Co. was conducting the threatre Ganesh Talkies. The said firm transferred the said threatre and 1st petitioner is carrying on the business in the name and style of M/s. Ganesh Talkies of screening and exhibiting motion films at 41, Arthur Road, Lalbaug, Bombay. The said threatre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document