SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 360

B.H.MARLAPALLE, D.S.ZOTING
Jayprakash S/o. Raosaheb Salunke and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.:---Heard Shri Hon, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Sawant, learned Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, respondent No. 3 is present personally and has made the record available through the learned Government Pleader. Heard Shri Salunke, learned Counsel for the added respondent No. 4 and Shri Shah, learned Counsel for the Intervenors/respondent Nos. 5 to 10.

2.Rule. Rule taken up, by consent, for final hearing forthwith.

3.The petitioners claim to be the members of the managing committee of the Trimurti Stalk Ply Sahakari Sanstha Limited Basmat, Taluka Basmat, District Hingoli which is a registered co-operative society under the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short, the Act). The respondent No. 4 is the Chairman of the said managing committee and the added respondents are other members of the said committee. It is contended that total number of managing committee members is 15. On 10th April, 2000 the petitioners submitted a motion of no confidence before the District Deputy Registrar, against the respondent No. 4 Chairman, in the prescribed form and accordingly the District Deputy Registrar (resp




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top