SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 64

A.S.BAGGA
Balasaheb Manikrao Deshmukh and another – Appellant
Versus
Rama Lingoji Warthi – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.S. BAGGA, J.:---This Second-Appeal raises an important point of law viz. the applicability of the doctrine of part performance enacted under the provisions of section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act. The facts giving rise to filing of this Second Appeal briefly stated are as follows.

2.The present appellants had brought a suit (which was registered as Civil Suit No. 187/73) for specific performance of the contract and for permanent injunction in respect of the suit property i.e. Survey No. 5/C/3 admeasuring 2 acres 22 gunthas situated at village Kiki, Tahsil and District Nanded against the present respondent. The suit for specific performance was dismissed but decree of permanent injunction came to be passed in that suit in favour of the present appellants. The matter was taken upto this Court. This Court in Second Appeal confirmed the decree in favour of the present appellants as far as it related to permanent injunction against respondent. The relief of specific performance was not granted holding that the suit for specific performance was barred by law of limitation. The aforesaid Civil Suit No. 187/73 was decided by the trial Court on 31-7-1975.

3.After the dism















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top