SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 119

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Tertuliano Renato de Silva and another – Appellant
Versus
Francisco Lourenco Bettencourt de Silva and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.:---This revision application arises from the order dated 8th February, 1999 passed in Civil Misc. Appln. No. 133/98/A in Special Civil Suit No. 67/90/A by the Civil Judge S.D., Vasco-da-Gama. By the impugned order, the Trial Court has dismissed the application dated 10-7-98 filed by the petitioners for amendment of the written statement.

2.Placing reliance upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of (Basavan Jaggu Dhobi v. Sukhnandan Ramdas Chaudhary (dead) through L.R.S. and others)1, reported in 1995 Supp. (3) S.C.C. 179, Shri Kantak, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submitted that it is settled law that it is open to the defendant to take even contrary stands or contradictory stands in the written statement and bearing in mind the said judgment of the Apex Court, the Trial Court has clearly acted with material irregularity in rejecting the application for amendment filed by the respondents. He further submitted that by the proposed amendment, the petitioners/defendants had sought to raise an additional plea based on facts which are already pleaded in the written statement and in addition had sought leave to introduce the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top