R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Tertuliano Renato de Silva and another – Appellant
Versus
Francisco Lourenco Bettencourt de Silva and another – Respondent
2.Placing reliance upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of (Basavan Jaggu Dhobi v. Sukhnandan Ramdas Chaudhary (dead) through L.R.S. and others)1, reported in 1995 Supp. (3) S.C.C. 179, Shri Kantak, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submitted that it is settled law that it is open to the defendant to take even contrary stands or contradictory stands in the written statement and bearing in mind the said judgment of the Apex Court, the Trial Court has clearly acted with material irregularity in rejecting the application for amendment filed by the respondents. He further submitted that by the proposed amendment, the petitioners/defendants had sought to raise an additional plea based on facts which are already pleaded in the written statement and in addition had sought leave to introduce the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.