SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 148

B.H.MARLAPALLE, D.S.ZOTING
Council for Protection of Human Rights – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.:---The petitioner namely Council for Protection of Human Rights at Aurangabad, claims to be an organisation formed for the protection of human rights and also to voice against the violation of human rights. It does not appear to be an organisation which has registered itself under a relevant statute of the State or the Central Government and the learned Counsel for the petitioner stated that after filing the petition in the nature of a Public Interest Petition, it has taken steps to register itself and the application for such a registration is pending before the Assistant Charity Commissioner at Aurangabad for registration under the Societies Registration Act, as well as under the Bombay Public Trusts Act. In this petition the prayers made are substantially as under :-

(i) The Central Bureau of Investigation be directed to investigate the whole incident of police violence that has allegedly taken place on 6-12-99 on the premises of Vikram Stadium (a police ground) at Aurangabad.

(ii) To direct to pay an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- as a compensation to the near relations of a person who lost his life and similar amount be paid to the lady victims whose m



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top