Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(AURANGABAD BENCH)
B.B. Vagyani, J.
Vanmala w/o Maroti Hatkar..... Petitioner.
Versus
Maroti Sambhaji Hatkar..... Respondent.
Civil Revision Application No. 271 of 1991, decided on 13-4-1999.
Advocates appeared :
H.K. Mundhe, for the petitioner.
A Court can, in exercise of its powers under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, pass order of staying the petition of divorce if it is found that the husband deliberately and contumaciously flouts the order of the Court. There is a power in the Court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice and to prevent any abuse of process .of the Court. The matrimonial Court, therefore, was under duty to invoke the inherent powers under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code and should have compelled the erring husband to deposit whole of the arrears of interim alimony and the expenses of the proceedings in the Court within certain point of time. If inspite of passing of such orders, the party under liability flouts the order deliberately, the Court can stay the petition or the proceedings of divorce if the erring party is a petitioner. Similarly, if the erring party is the respondent, the Court can strike off the defence of such a party if it is found that the respondent is deliberately flouting the orders of the Court.
Section 24-Civil Procedure Code, Section 151-0rder of interim alimony pendente lite and expenses in proceedings for divorce in favour of wife-Default in compliance with the order-If the erring party is the petitioner in the matrimonial proceeding the proceedings can be ordered to be stayed-Where the erring party is the respondent the Court can strike off the defence of such party. Where the order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is not complied with the Court can in exercise of its powers under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, pass an order staying the petition of divorce if it is found that the husband deliberately and contincausly flouts the order or the Court. There is power in the Court to make~ orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice and to prevent any abuse of process of the Court. The matrimonial Court is under duty to invoke the inherent powers under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code and compel the erring husband to deposit whole of the arrears of interim alimony and the expenses of the proceedings in the Court within certain time. If in spite of passing of such orders, the party under liability flouts the order deliberately, the Court can stay the petition or the proceedings if the erring party is a petitioner. Similarly, if the erring party is the respondent, the Court can strike off the defence of such a party if it is found that the respondent is deliberately flouting the orders of the Court.
Section 24-Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151-Claim for interim alimony by wife-Intervention of Court sought-Claim rejected with direction to file separate execution petition-Validity-Held, not valid Court can compel husband to deposit whole of arrears of interim alimony and expenses of proceedings in Court in exercise of inherent powers under Section 151, CPC.- The Matrimonial Court therefore, was under duty to invoke the inherent powers under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code and should have compelled the erring husband do deposit whole of the arrears of interim alimony and the expenses of the proceedings in the Court within certain point of time.
Section 24-Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151-Petition for divorce-Interim alimony pendente lite and expenses granted to wife against husband-Husband defaulter-Where husband is petitioner for divorce, further proceedings to be stayed-But where husband is respondent his defence can be struck off-Court can pass such orders invoking inherent powers under Section 151, CPC.- The learned Matrimonial Court, it appears, laboured under wrong impression that it lacks jurisdiction in the matter of enforcement of the order in the nature of interim alimony. He has completely forgotten the very purpose of Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code. A Court can, in exercise of its powers under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, pass an order of staying the petition of divorce if it is found that the husband deliberately and contumaciously flouts the order of the Court.
2. This Civil Revision Application raises a question as to what should be the approach of the Matrimonial Court in the matter of enforcement of the order with regard to interim alimony pendente lite.
3. The husband filed petition for divorce under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nanded. The wife appeared in the divorce proceedings. The wife has got one daughter. She is a penniless woman. She has no means for her survival. She was at the mercy of her brother. The wife filed an application under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act and moved the Matrimonial Court for interim alimony. The said application was resisted by the husband. However, the Matrimonial Court allowed the application of wife and granted interim alimony @ Rs. 100/- p.m. to the wife and Rs. 50/- p.m. to the daughter. The Court has also granted Rs. 100/- by way expenses of the proceedings for divorce.
4. The husband did not pay the interim alimony and the costs of the proceedings to the wife in spite of the order of the Court in that behalf. The helpless wife then filed an application and moved the Court seeking intervention of the Court for direction to pay arrears of maintenance and the expenses of the proceedings. This application filed by the wife was also resisted by the husband on the ground that he is unable to deposit Rs. 700/- in lump sum. The husband, while resisting the application filed by the wife, advised the wife that she should file execution petition separately for the purpose of recovery of arrears of maintenance and the expenses of the proceedings.
5. The learned Matrimonial Court rejected the application by order dated 21-1-1991. The learned Judge, by his rejection order, directed the wife to file execution proceedings for the purpose of recovery of arrears of maintenance and the expenses of the proceedings. The learned Judge observed that once an order entitling the respondent wife to receive the maintenance amount is passed, it is not necessary that any other direction deserves to be given.
6. This rejection order is challenged in this Civil Revision Application. The proceedings initiated by the husband is the petition for divorce. The wife has no independent income of her own for bare survival. She is a penniless woman unable to bear the necessary expenses of the proceedings for divorce. Visualising the difficulties to go with such a kind of proceedings, a discretionary power is conferred on the Matrimonial Court in the matter of grant of maintenance pendente lite. The Court, in such a proceedings and under the given circumstance, can award the expenses of the proceedings also. The right of a wife for maintenance is an incident of status or estate of matrimony. In the instant case, the wife who is a penniless woman and who is required to fight out a proceeding of divorce, moved the Matrimonial Court for interim alimony pendente lite for herself and for her daughter. The learned Judge allowed the application for interim alimony and awarded interim alimony to the wife and the daughter. In addition to the interim alimony, the learned Judge granted a paltry amount of Rs. 100/- by way of expenses of the proceeding. A sum of Rs. 100/- is so meagre with which a proceeding like divorce cannot be properly and effectively fought. I failed to understand the logic behind the order awarding such a paltry amount by way of expenses of the proceedings.
7. The Court, under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, is empowered to pass an order of interim alimony which is to operate during the pendency of the main proceedings. The husband appears to have ignored the order of interim alimony passed in favour of the wife and preferred to remain in arrears of interim alimony. He has not deposited Rs. 100/- granted to the wife to meet the expenses of the proceedings. When the wife moved the Matrimonial Court for interventi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
