IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Vishnu Sahai P.V. Kakade, JJ.
Lalchand Cheddilal Yadav..... Appellant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra..... Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 168 of 1996, decided on 2-3-2000.
Advocates appeared :
J.A. Barday, for the appellant.
Ms. Usha Kejriwal, A.P.P., for the respondent.
Section 27-Once the factum of sealing of the knife becomes doubtful, possibility of blood being smeared on it prior to its being sent to the Chemical Analyst cannot be ruled out-Prosecution did not prove that right from the time, the knife came into possession of the police and till it was sent to the Chemical Analyst, the seals were intact...,.... The person who carried the knife to the Chemical Analyst had not been examined by the prosecution-Extremely unsafe to place reliance on recovery evidence in the circumstances.
Sections 61 and 3-veracity in recovery of articles-Recovery of knife in possession of police and chemical analyst report that seal was intact doubtful-Examination of habitual panch-Recovery not legal.
Section 114(g)-Blood stained knife and blood stained clothes of appellant recovered on pointing out by appellant in presence of two public panchas -Panchas not examined by prosecution neither any reason furnished for not examining them- Fit case to draw presumption under Section 114(g) by Court that if evidence which could be produced is not produced, the presumption is that it would have gone against the party which withholds it.
2.Shortly stated the prosecution case runs as under :-
On 26-8-1992 at about 7 p.m., Rajendra Sahani P.W. 8 along with one Murli was standing on a platform near Shivshakti sugar-cane Vakhar, Carter Road-9, Borivali (East) Bombay. He heard the appellant who was working in the sugarcane vakhar of one Babulal situated adjacent to Khandwani building asking Shamlal who was a co-worker in the said vakhar to bring a diary. Thereafter, Rajendra Sahani, Murli, Shamlal and the appellant stood on the said platform. After sometime, Murli went towards Sukharwadi to answer the call of nature and Rajendra Sahani P.W. 8 for urinating. Just before he had left for urinating, he heard an exchange of hot words between the appellant and one Ramkumar over a monetary dispute. After he had returned from urinating, he saw the appellant inflicting knife blows on Ramkumar, as a consequence of which, the latter fell down. Thereafter, the appellant ran away. Thereafter, Rajendra Sahani P.W. 8 went to his employers (Khandwani Company) where the police questioned him.
2-A.The evidence of Babulal Yadav P.W. 1 shows that on 26-8-1992 after he had returned to his house, after making enquiries about his son Omprakash, who had gone to deliver goods by a tempo at Vashi, and had not returned, he found that a crowd had collected near his house. He found that Ramkumar was lying in a pool of blood. Consequently, on a jeep he took Ramkumar to a private clinic but, the doctor was not available there, and thereafter took him to Bhagwati Hospital, where the doctor on examining him declared him to be dead.
3.The evidence of Inspector Uday Sharma P.W. 12 who at the time of the incident was attached to Kasturba Police Station, Borivali shows that on receiving information from Bhagwati Hospital that one Ramkumar had been brought by Babulal Yadav P.W. 1 to the said hospital, with stab injuries on his person, he proceeded to Bhagwati Hospital. He recorded the F.I.R. of Babulal Yadav; prepared a panchanama of the corpse; and prepared the spot panchanama.
4.The evidence of S.I. Dilip Navkhurkar P.W. 10 shows that on 26-8-1992 sometimes after 7.15 p.m. the informant told him that the appellant may be at the house of his relative at Ulhasnagar. Consequently, he along with the informant proceeded to Ulhasnagar and found that the appellant was sleeping in the house of one Ramsajiwan Yadav P.W. 7. He asked him to put on his clothes; brought him to the police station; and at about 7 a.m. arrested him. Thereafter, in the presence of the public panchas, he prepared the panchanama of the clothes of the appellant, amongst which the full pant had blood stains. His evidence shows that during the course of interrogation, the appellant admitted that he could have the knife recovered. Consequently, the said information, in the presence of public panch Pramod Waigankar was recorded in a panchanama. Thereafter, the appellant led him, public panch Pramod Waigankar P.W. 4, another public panch and some police personnel to the place of the incident, which was a cement platform like a structure and after removing the tin roof, he produced the knife which was blood-stained. The said recovery was effected under a panchanama.
It is pertinent to mention that the clothes of the appellant, the knife, clothes of the deceased and some other articles were sent to the Chemical Analyst.
After the completion of the investigation, the appellant was charge- sheeted.
5.The autopsy on the corpse of the deceased was conducted by Dr. Baban Shinde P.W. 11 who found on it the following four ante mortem injuries:-
"1. Stab wound 7.5. cm x 3 cm x cavity deep loops of intestines protruding out.
2. Stab wound 10
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.