SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 880

VISHNU SAHAI, D.G.DESHPANDE
Gokul Dadu Jadhav and another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J.:---Though this appeal, the appellants challenge the judgment and order dated 17-6-1995 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 123 of 1994, convicting and sentencing them in the manner stated hereinafter:-

(i) Gokul Dadu Jadhav:---Under section 302 I.P.C. to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- in default to undergo three months R.I.; and

(ii) Datta Suresh Awale:---Under section 302 r/w 34 I.P.C. to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- in default to undergo three months R.I.

It is pertinent to mention that along with the appellants, was tried one Digambar Khandale but, he has been acquitted vide the impugned judgment and the State of Maharashtra has not challenged his acquittal by preferring an appeal under section 378(1) Cr.P.C.

2.In short, the prosecution case runs as under:-

On 9-1-1994, there was marriage of Sham Bate P.W. 2 in Kasam Zopdpatti within the limits of District Pune. The marriage was performed at 7.45 p.m. Thereafter, some of the invitees sat for dinner. The appellants, the acquitted accused Digamber Khandale and some other persons, who were also invited, started danc






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top