S.S.NIJJAR
Crescent Petroleum Ltd. . – Appellant
Versus
M. V. MONCHEGORSK and another – Respondent
2. The defendants claim the dismissal of the suit on three grounds. These are:
(i) That the suit in rem is without jurisdiction and not maintainable against the defendant vessel;
(ii) That even on the plaintiff's reasonably best arguable case the suit as framed is not maintainable;
(iii) That the suit as framed and on the basis of which the Warrant of Arrest has been obtained is vitiated by material misrepresentation or by suppression of material facts.
In support of the first ground, it is submitted by Mr. Mukherjee, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of first defendant, that the present application proceeds as on a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.