SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 648

D.D.SINHA, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Anil s/o Dnyandeorao Barbude and another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.N. SRIKRISHNA, J.:---Rule returnable forthwith to respondent No. 1 and 4 who are the only parties found to be heard to resolve the grievance in this writ petition. Respondents 2 and 3 are mere formal parties and hence no service on them is necessary.

2. The petitioners passed H.S.S.C. Examination from Nagpur Divisional Board held sometime in the months of March 1991 and March 1989 respectively. On 16-7-1991, the petitioners joined the Two years' Diploma in Teaching (Dip. T.) course offered by Sagar (M.P.) University and passed the same. The first petitioner passed Dip.T. on 30-4-1993 and the second petitioner passed it on 30-4-1994. On 31-5-1993, the said Dip.T. Course offered by Saugar (M.P.) University was derecognized by the Government of Maharashtra. On 27th July, 1997, the petitioners were appointed as Assistant Teachers in the respondent No. 2 school and joined the respective posts on 1-8-1997. A proposal for grant of approval to the appointment of the petitioners was submitted by the respondent No. 2 school to the fourth respondent sometime in the month of October, 1997. On 5th August 1998, the fourth respondent refused to grant approval to the appointment of th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top