M.B.SHAH, S.RADHAKRISHNAN, B.P.SARAF, S.H.KAPADIA
Colour Chem Ltd. . – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City II, Bombay. . . . .
Bombay City II, Bombay – Respondent
"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that proportionate salary of employees of assessee for the period of their stay outside India in the ordinary course of their employment should not be excluded from the total salary while computing disallowance under section 40-A(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"
2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amount representing medical reimbursement given to employees which was not treated as perquisite in computing disallowance under section 40-A(5) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 should be treated as part of salary for computation of disallowance under said provision?"
3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that amount payable towards surtax was not liable to be deducted in computing the profits and gains of the business of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.