SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 184

M.B.SHAH, S.RADHAKRISHNAN, B.P.SARAF, S.H.KAPADIA
Colour Chem Ltd. . – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City II, Bombay. . . . . Bombay City II, Bombay – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.H. KAPADIA, J.:---By this reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions of law to this Court for opinion.

"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that proportionate salary of employees of assessee for the period of their stay outside India in the ordinary course of their employment should not be excluded from the total salary while computing disallowance under section 40-A(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"

2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the amount representing medical reimbursement given to employees which was not treated as perquisite in computing disallowance under section 40-A(5) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 should be treated as part of salary for computation of disallowance under said provision?"

3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that amount payable towards surtax was not liable to be deducted in computing the profits and gains of the business of t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top