D.K.DESHMUKH, A.C.AGARWAL, S.S.PARKAR
Arun Construction Co. – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Housing and Area Development Board & another. . . . .
Area Development Board and another – Respondent
2.In both the suits, issue of limitation has been framed i.e. Issue No. 7 which reads as under :-
"Whether the suit filed by the plaintiffs is within limitation?"
Both the parties have agreed to try this issue as preliminary issue. The learned Counsel for the defendants made a statement that he accepts for the purpose of decision of this issue, averments in paragraph 16 of the plaint in both the suits. Both the suits have been filed by the plaintiffs for a decree of damages against the defendant No. 1. According to the plaintiffs, tenders were invited by the defendants for some work to be carried out. The plaintiffs submitted the tender. According to the plaintiffs, tender of the plaintiffs was accepted. However, the work was not commenced. According to the plaintiffs, as a result of acceptance of the tender, a binding contract between the parties has come into existence. According to the plaintiffs, the defendants have committed breach of that co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.