SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 234

H.L.GOKHALE
Herbertsons Ltd. . – Appellant
Versus
Kishore Rajaram Chhabria and others And Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - H.L. GOKHALE, J.:---This is a chamber summons taken out by two companies seeking to join as party defendants in a suit which is filed by the plaintiff company against one K.R. Chhabria and 10 others. Mr. Kadam has appeared for the applicants in support of this chamber summons. Mr. Seervai has appeared for the plaintiff company which opposes this prayer. Mr. Madon has appeared for defendants No. 1 to 4, 6 and 11 and Mr. Thakkar has appeared for defendants No. 7 to 10. Nobody has appeared for defendant No. 5 one Mr. Ganguli though served.

2.This chamber summons is supported by the affidavit in support of the company secretary of intervenor No. 1 i.e. Shaw Wallace Co.

3.Before I deal with the averments in the affidavit in support as also the submissions of Mr. Kadam, it is desirable to refer to the suit in a nutshell. This suit filed by the plaintiff-Herbertsons Ltd. seeks principally two fold relief. The first relief is a declaration that the notice dated 2nd December, 1999 convening the 13th Annual General Meeting of the defendant No. 11 - BDA Ltd. on 27th December, 1999 is valid and is binding on defendant No. 2. The second principal relief is for a declaration that defe















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top