SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 80

S.B.MHASE
Shrikrishna Oil Mill – Appellant
Versus
Radhakishan Ramchandra – Respondent


JUDGMENT -S.B. MHASE, J.:---This is a revision application under section 26 of the Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 challenging the orders passed by the Rent Controller, Latur in Case No. 1982/R.C.A./O/1 decided on 21st January, 1988 and of the District Judge, Latur, in Rent Appeal No. 3 of 1988 decided on 21-6-1989. By these proceedings the petitioner tenant has been directed to vacate the godown premises bearing Municipal No. 162/163/9 situated at Zinganappa Galli, Latur.

2.The petitioner is a tenant of the premises Municipal No. 162/163/9 situated in Zinganappa Galli, Latur and the respondent is the landlord. These premises were rented out initially at the rent of Rs. 1500/- for the period of one year to locate the Oil Mill of the petitioner firm. That agreement is not on record and which is the year in which the said agreement was effected that is also not on record. But however, both the parties agreed that such an agreement was there. The respondent landlord therefore has made out a case that after the period of the said agreement is over as there was no fresh agreement of tenancy, the petitioner continued to be in possession of the said godown as














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top