SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 366

S.B.MHASE
Nanded Wine Mart – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Shankarlal Dhoot – Respondent


JUDGMENT- S.B MHASE, J.:---This Revision under section 26 of the Hyderabad Houses (Rent Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 is directed against the order passed by the District Judge, Nanded in Rent Appeal HRCA No. 28 of 1989, decided on 7-8-1990 wherein the said District Judge dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner and confirmed the order passed by the Rent Controller for eviction of the petitioner from the said premises on the grounds under section 15 (3)(a)(iii) and section 15(2)(v) of the Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 and also further allowed the cross objections filed by the respondent and granted an order of eviction in favour of the respondent on the ground under section 15(2)(i) of the said Act.

2.The petitioner is tenant of the suit premises bearing Municipal No. 3-1-14 admeasuring 25 ft. to the east-west and 30 ft. north-south, situated at Station Road, Nanded and agreed rent of the said premises is Rs. 400/- per month and the petitioner entered the said premises as tenant in 1974. Initially the respondent/landlord filed eviction proceedings bearing No. 88-MAG-RCA-13 before the Rent Controller, Nanded claiming the eviction of the pet
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top