SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 958

A.D.MANE, F.I.REBELLO, R.M.LODHA, A.B.PALKAR
Bijaysingh Mansingh Baid and others – Appellant
Versus
Mansingh H. Baid – Respondent


JUDGMENT -F.I. REBELLO, J.:---The petitioning creditor has moved the Court by way of notice under section 9(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act which hereafter shall be referred to as 'the Act'. By the present Notice of Motion the judgment debtor Nos. 1 and 2 have prayed that the Notice of Insolvency served on judgment Debtors Nos. 1 and 2 be set aside. A few facts may be set out which will assist the Court in deciding the issue in controversy.

2.An Award was passed in arbitral proceedings between the judgment creditor, judgment Debtors and others. The judgment creditor has been identified in the Award as belonging to MSB Group. Shri Bijaysingh Mansingh Baid, Sunderdevi Bijaysingh Baid, Jaykumar Bijaysingh Baid, Aruna Ajaykumar Baid, Sanjaykumar Bijaysingh Baid, Minakshi Sanjaykumar Baid and Vinaykumar Bijaysingh Baid are described as belonging to BSB Group. Similarly, Tejsingh M. Baid and Samta Tejsingh Baid are described as belonging to TSB Group. The matter was referred for the decision of the Sole Arbitrator by three separate writings as reflected in the Award. The relevant part of the award which will be necessary for the purpose of the present discussion is as under :---











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top