N.P.CHAPALGAONKER, B.H.MARLAPALLE, R.M.LODHA, J.A.PATIL
Secretary and another – Appellant
Versus
Chintamani Birjaprasad Dubey and others – Respondent
2.For the sake of convenience I intend to refer to the facts of Writ Petition No. 2640 of 1984. The petitioner is the original disputant under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short "Co-operative Societies Act"). The disputant is registered under the provisions of the Co-operative Societies Act. The respondent No. 1 is also a society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act and respondent No. 2 is the District Central Co-operative Bank which too is registered under the Co-operative Societies Act. It is the case of the disputant that it carries on business in wholesale of fertilisers. The disputant appointed the respondent No. 1 as sub seller of the fertilisers as per the terms and conditions of letter dated 17-6-1968. According to the terms and conditions of the said agreement the disputant supplied the fertiliser to the respondent No. 1 on credit for sale. Respondent No 2 stood gu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.