SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 456

P.S.PATANKAR, S.D.GUNDEWAR
Madhukar Pralhadrao Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT- P.S. PATANKAR, J.:---Rule returnable forthwith. Heard both sides for disposal. No reply is filed in spite of the order dated 14-12-98. By this petition, the petitioner is praying for restoration of one-third pension after 15 years of his absorption in Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation in view of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

2.The petitioner entered the service on 7-7-47 in the Revenue Department of the State Government. He worked in the Department upto 24-6-67. At that stage the State Government took the decision to establish Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and some of the officers working under the State Government were to be deputed. The petitioner was accordingly deputed on 24-6-67. He came to be absorbed permanently in Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Service on 19-5-72 as per the Government Resolution of the even date. The said Government Resolution provided that retirement benefits admissible under the concerned Government Resolution should be sanctioned to the petitioner. Accordingly orders of payment of commuted value of pension under letter dated 5-3-81 was issued. The petitioner was accordingly pa














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top